logo
down
shadow

Unsatisfied dependencies for type X with qualifiers @Default


Unsatisfied dependencies for type X with qualifiers @Default

By : Merlin Assange Pervs
Date : November 20 2020, 01:01 AM
like below fixes the issue In Java EE 7, the default scanning for JARs/WARs is annotated, meaning that if you don't have a beans.xml that specifies the scan mode, it will default to annotated based scanning.
Your class, GreeterImpl has no bean defining annotations on it - no scopes particularly. You can override this by adding a beans.xml or by adding @Dependent (or other scope) to your GreeterImpl
code :


Share : facebook icon twitter icon
Unsatisfied dependencies for type [PartitionManager] with qualifiers [@Default]?

Unsatisfied dependencies for type [PartitionManager] with qualifiers [@Default]?


By : dubwub
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
seems to work fine It appears as though it was an issue with the PicketLink module as created by the PicketLink Installer. There is a small bug that was causing it to not be configured correctly within JBoss EAP 6.1. Packaging the JARs in the EAR file worked with no problem.
WELD-001408: Unsatisfied dependencies for type Customer with qualifiers @Default

WELD-001408: Unsatisfied dependencies for type Customer with qualifiers @Default


By : user3135593
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
I wish this helpful for you Your Customer class has to be discovered by CDI as a bean. For that you have two options:
Unsatisfied dependencies for type ZZZZ with qualifiers @Default

Unsatisfied dependencies for type ZZZZ with qualifiers @Default


By : user3843824
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
wish of those help The problem is the @Singleton annotation, that is from javax.ejb and not javax.inject. Using the ejb one and defining the interface your bean is registered on CDI context as the interface, not implementation, change your code:
code :
@Inject
public CustomerService(EmailService mailService) {
    this.mailService = (DefaultEmailService) mailService;
}
Unsatisfied dependencies for type SecurityContext with qualifiers @Default

Unsatisfied dependencies for type SecurityContext with qualifiers @Default


By : user2454630
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
around this issue At least one IdentityStore must be provided. Once that is done, the issue disappears and the application is able to deploy.
Unsatisfied dependencies for type EntityManager with qualifiers @Default

Unsatisfied dependencies for type EntityManager with qualifiers @Default


By : thirtysixwind
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
I wish this help you We normally inject EntityManager through '@PersistenceContext(unitname="name")' In order for you to use the constructor injection for the EntityManager, you would probably need to define a producer method.
shadow
Privacy Policy - Terms - Contact Us © ourworld-yourmove.org