 Is there any proxy to behave like a "virtual" SVN server connected to the remote repository?
By : Jonathan Piacentino
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
I hope this helps you . There are at least two known for me solutions of this problem. The first is a detailed configuration of the remote master and the local slave SVN-servers using the slave-side SVNMasterURI directive. As far as I understand at the moment (but I still have not tried it yet) considering a proposed solution, this solution may have some difficulties: using svnsync (it may cause absolute synchronization with the master repository - that is not always fine); master server specific configuration, but that is not always possible because of no permissions to administrate the master repository; some possible problems of the slave repository work; as far as I understand the scope of SVNMasterURI directive, total submission of entire slave server (not a single slave repository) to the master one.
|
 Does C++ create default "Constructor/Destructor/Copy Constructor/Copy assignment operator" for pure virtual cl
By : Soumya Ranjan Sahu
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
this will help Furthermore i wannt to know if it is reasonable to define a virtual destructor for a pure virtual Interface, like the one above? (So no pointers or data is used in here, so nothing has to be destructed) code :
class ImyInterface
{
virtual void myInterfaceFunction() = 0;
virtual ~ImyInterface() = 0;
}
ImyInterface::~ImyInterface() = default;
|
The constructor function in a pure virtual class should be "protected" or "public"?
By : Usman Ali
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
I wish this helpful for you It doesn't really matter, since you're not allowed to construct objects of the base class anyway. Making it protected serves only as a reminder of the fact that the class is supposed to be a base class; it's only cosmetics/documentation. Consider code :
struct Base {
virtual ~Base() = 0;
protected:
Base() { std::puts("Base constructor"); }
};
Base::~Base() { std::puts("Base destructor"); }
struct Derived : Base {};
int main()
{
//Base b; // compiler error
Derived d;
Base *b = new Derived();
delete b;
}
|
Are the "Prototype pattern" and the "Virtual constructor" the same patterns?
By : kusum chouhan
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
this will help Does the Virtual constructor - implementing virtual function clone(): ,
... mean the same concept as the Prototype design pattern?
|
 Why "click","delegate" and "live" behave differently in terms of event bubbling using jQue
By : Evren Sezgin
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
may help you . To start, live is deprecated in favor of on and delegate in jQuery 1.7+. I would stop using live now rather than later. The docs linked above are actually very informative and do a great job of explaining how these functions work. Delegate and live both rely on bubbling. Which is how they differ from click. The event has bubbled up to them. Delegate is superior to live because you tell it to monitor a specific parent whereas live bubbles all the way up to the document level. Very expensive.
|
» 
code :
Related Posts :